« ProfCast Category Converter | Main | All-In-One Podcasting Services »

Aug 1
Citizen Podcasters, who protects them?
Note: Leesa Barnes takes over this blog while Jon enjoys his nuptials and honeymoon on the West Coast. He returns August 10th. Enjoy Leesa's take on podcasting in the meantime.

I was watching CityPulse last night. I normally don't, but when I'm on my computer, I really don't pay attention to anything else.

Maybe that's why I'm still single. But I digress...

There was a piece that finally got my attention. It was an announcement from one of the on air personalities, encouraging citizen journalists to visit their website and submit their videos and pictures on an interesting news item.

On the one hand, I applaud this effort. Not only is CityPulse encouraging citizen journalists to participate in the making and dissemination of news, but so too is Canoe, a Quebecor property.

However, I'm concerned that the media is getting way too much free labour. To the point where I have to ask, "Who's protecting the work that citizen journalists produce and send to mainstream media?"

It seems like no one is. Take a look at what you're agreeing to on the Canoe website when you upload your video content:

"I hereby confirm to Canoë Inc. that I am the owner of all rights in the picture(s), videos or recordings (the "Material") that I am sending to Canoë and I irrevocably assign all of these rights to Canoë without the payment of any fee."

And here's the verbiage from the CityPulse upload section:

"By uploading content to this archive, the participant (i) grants to CHUM a non-exclusive, irrevocable license to use the content for any publicity or programming purposes, in all media, without remuneration, throughout the world in perpetuity."

In essence, these terms are saying,  "Sorry, sucker, but we're not going to give you any credit for this little gem you sent our way. You won't see your name in lights, we won't even give you a red cent. We'll own what you create and there's nothing you can do. Thanks for the content dumb-dumb."

This reminds me of a quote I read about 2-years ago when Prince started to use his name again. He changed his name from The Artist Formerly Known As Prince back to Prince once he had complete ownership over the masters to his songs. His memorable quote?

"It's like FedEx telling me they now own the contents of a package I put together just because I'm using their delivery method."

For all the podcasters reading this, do the terms above make you think twice about giving your content away to big media houses?

0 Comments/Trackbacks




Comments/Trackbacks are closed for maintenance.


« ProfCast Category Converter | Main | All-In-One Podcasting Services »

Advertise

sponsored ads



subscribe


Prefer Email?
Subscribe below-

Enter your Email:


Powered by FeedBlitz What's this?

Current News

Support This Blog

business social media

Use these fast growing business social media sites to promote your business, feature your products, spotlight your business leaders, create links, and drive traffic back to your company site, all for free!

BIZZlogos - Add your logo - free link to your site
BIZZphotos - Add photos of your products and people
BIZZprofiles - Submit your profile and build your online visibility
BIZZspotlight - Spotlight your business with free links
BIZZvideos - Videos about businesses, products and business people.
BIZZbites - "Digg" for Business - Submit your articles and posts

know more media network

View Network Map

Network Feed List (OPML)

Know More Media Network
Feed


we support unitus

PRWeb

Influencer



BizPodcasting is a member of the Know More Media network of business related blogs.

Here are some current headlines from some of our business publications:

ProductivityGoal

CallCenterScript

AdHurl

TheBizofKnowledge

LandingTheDeal

CustomersAreAlways

HealthCareVox

BrainBasedBusiness

TheInsurancePolicy

MarketingBlurb